Olympic House

The International Union of Architects (UIA) and the International Olympic Committee (IOC) collaborated to launch a two-stage international architectural competition in 2013.

View the call for entries here

The selection documents were published on 28 March 2013. The 12 candidates chosen to take part in this project competition, by the jury in Lausanne on 17 June 2013, were the following architecture practices:

  • Jean Marc IBOS – Myrto Vitart (France)
  • XDGA – Xaveer De Geyter Architecten (Belgium)
  • Brasil Arquitetura Ltda. (Brazil)
  • Groupe 3 Architectes S.N.C. (Morocco)
  • AL_A – Amanda Levete Architects Ltd (United Kingdom)
  • Toyo Ito & Associates, Architects (Japan)
  • Office for Metropolitan Architecture (Netherlands)
  • Nieto Sobejano Arquitectos GmbH (Germany)
  • PIUARCH S.r.l. (Italy)
  • 3XN (Denmark)
  • Diller Scofidio + Renfro (USA)
  • Farshid Moussavi Architecture (United Kingdom).

The second step of the procedure (architecture competition) was launched on 30 July 2013. The jury session took place in Lausanne on 7 and 8 December 2013.

Read more about the competition here

Read more about the project by 3XN

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) officially opened Olympic House – one of the most sustainable buildings in the world – on 23 June 2019. The inauguration was the highlight of the celebrations to mark the 125th anniversary of the IOC.

Developed by Danish architecture firm 3XN, Olympic House was designed around the five key elements of symbolism, integration, flexibility, collaboration and sustainability. The firm partnered with Swiss architects IttenBrechbühl to oversee the construction of the building. The result is a building that authentically reflects Olympism, the Olympic Movement and the role of the IOC as a catalyst for collaboration in an iconic form.

Read more about Olympic House

Keywords : Institutional, Sustainability

Prizes

The contracting authority paid each selected candidate who submitted a project in conformity with the competition programme the sum of CHF 30,000, excluding VAT.

In addition, the jury had at its disposal an amount of CHF 100,000, excluding VAT, to pay for at least three prizes.

Competition results

Olympic House

Olympic House

Olympic House

Olympic House

Olympic House

Olympic House

Olympic House

Olympic House

Theme and objectives

The objective of the competition was to:

  • Create new headquarters for 600 staff members on one site.
  • Plan for the development of the “Olympic House” housing administrative buildings. The surface area of the plot available to the IOC is 24,000 m2.

Key criteria

The selection criteria were as follows:

  • Approach to the problem: 30% of the final grading;
  • References: 50% of the final grading;
  • Organisation: 20% of the final grading.

Also, the International Olympic Committee underlined several points which had to be taken into consideration (non-exhaustive list):

  • Symbolism: The IOC headquarters is a place full of history and symbolism. Founded in 1894 and established in Lausanne in 1915, the IOC is an organisation that is over 100 years old, leading an Olympic Movement whose scope has grown incessantly in recent decades. Even though its vocation is not to host the general public, quite often sports coaches and Olympic fans stop outside the IOC headquarters. The headquarters had therefore to reflect Olympic values without being ostentatious, and strike a balance between history and modernity;
  • Cooperation and diversity: The headquarters had to be a welcoming place that would encourage internal and external cooperation and respect each person’s profile and cultural diversity;
  • Flexibility: The new building had to be designed to be flexible and adjustable so that it could be adapted as technologies and working methods evolve;
  • Sustainable development: The headquarters needed to be designed with sustainable development in mind. They had to implement all developmentrelated best practices, particularly with respect to the materials used and the minimisation of the building’s energy consumption, so as to offer staff a working environment that would promote health and safety at work and take into account various levels of mobility.

Jury Members

Chairman

Thomas BACH, IOC President

 

Non-professional members

  • Jacques ROGGE, IOC Honorary President
  • Nawal EL MOUTAWAKEL, IOC Vice-President
  • Craig REEDIE, IOC Vice-President
  • John COATES, IOC Vice-President
  • Ching-Kuo WU, architect, IOC member
  • Lambis NIKOLAOU, civil engineer, IOC member

Substitutes

  • Ser Miang NG, IOC member
  • Christophe DE KEPPER, IOC Director General
  • Gilbert FELLI,Olympic Games Executive Director

Professional members

  • Alejandro ARAVENA, architect
  • Kengo KUMA, architect
  • Inès LAMUNIERE, architect
  • Dominique PERRAULT, architect
  • Brigitte SHIM, architect
  • Craig VERZONE, landscape architect
  • Olivier FRANÇAIS, civil engineer member of Lausanne City Council, member of the Swiss Parliament
  • Nicole CHRISTE, Lausanne City architect

Substitute

  • Mauro Eugenio GIULIANI, civil engineer

Expert advisers

  • Timo LUMM, IOC Television & Marketing Services Director
  • Jean Benoît GAUTHIER, IOC Technology and Information Director
  • Marie SALLOIS DEMBREVILLE, Head of IOC Corporate Development
  • Thierry TRIBOLET, Head of IOC Technical and Logistics Services
  • Nicolas ROGEMOND, IOC Project manager

Eligibility

This competition was open to all professional architects in the world.



Results

Competition closed. Results announced on December 2013

COMPETITION RESULTS